Japanese nodes missing or ineffective

Technical Support
#1

For several days all usual Japanese nodes have been either missing or, in the case of the remaining ‘Tokyo - Google’ and ‘Osaka - Sakuranet’ nodes, giving 100ms higher than usual to EU-Germany servers–340ms rather than 220-230ms. The “available” nodes also often don’t actually connect. Instead, they go straight to packet loss and return error messages.

The result of this is that using Mudfish results in higher latency than not using the service, making it unuseable in the country. There have occasionally been missing nodes before, but not entire groups (the Aliyun nodes are gone completely) and it has never created blanket increases across all nodes in the country. There’s a problem of some sort.

#3

It’s getting worse. This needs addressing. Mudfish is completely unuseable in Japan atm and has been for a full week now.

#4

Please try to turn on “Include the result for the advanced mode” option which found under ‘Setup → Nodes’ menu. When it’s enabled, Today’s Pathes will show you the advanced results for route pathes.

However if I checked your configuration properly, it seems you’re trying to go through Russia to reach the europe… Yep… I should agree that mudfish russia nodes are getting worse and worse… :frowning: It looks like blocking from the goverment becomes more strict.

#5

Thanks for the response. Yeah, the only viable routes go through Russia at the moment :’)

I’ll give your suggestion a try and hope for the best. Did you find anything about the missing nodes on the JP side? Some of the more reliable ones have disappeared completely. I don’t know whether Mudfish has lost access to them or they’re down for a long time for some reason. Thank you.

#6

If you’re talking about mudfish nodes in Russia, then my answer is that yes we lost many of them.

However if you’re pointing to mudfish nodes in Japan, then I don’t think so because nothing (in a view of mudfish nodes) are changed or deleted. If you can tell us a name of mudfish nodes in Japan you used, I think it’ll be more helpful to narrow down what it was.