am using exitlag til now its so expencive. mudfish trial credits not enough to test. any mudfish users can tell the differance between exitlag vs mudfish connection quality ?
Yes, although making my own routing tables and process-based routing items is a bit annoying, which Exitlag and Gearup automatically do,
I have a 10ms decrease in ping from switching to using Mudfish from Gearup and Exitlag.
In Rainbow six siege, from averaging 70-100ms In UAE server to a stable 50ms and from 60-80ms in SEA server to 40ms stable.
In Rust, from 170-250ms in EU servers, to stable 150ms and from 80-100ms in SEA servers, to stable 70ms
The Pay per traffic is an amazing option for me because I only need it for gaming and that too not often every month. Exitlag prices are somewhat okay specially with their offers, but Gearup prices are rip offs. Mudfish is affordable for my gaming hobby. After all I am still paying my internet service provider where I cannot do anything about the poor routing that often occurs.
Please note, the experience is different user to user. For me I was able to figure out how to use mudfish and see the ping difference with the 70-100 Mb of trial data
But for proper stability testing, I went ahead and bought the minimum data plan.
Worth it for me.
I have although, only one day of experience since I started using it.
1 Like
@shehangamilxx Sorry for this inconvenience… I’d set a trial credit now for your account. 
So I think you can use all mudfish nodes and features for a while. Please let me know if there are any problems or questions.
This topic was automatically closed 21 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.