Would it be possible to support interface binding instead of VPN?

1

Say I have two interfaces: one low latency but low bandwidth (ifA) and one high latency but high bandwidth (ifB). For example, ifA might be a wired DSL connection while ifB might be a 5G mobile connection.

Would it be possible to support binding applications to a specific interface? There are programs like ForceBindIP but they are unreliable and outdated. It looks like Mudfish already supports a better method for interception via WFP filtering, only I would like filtered traffic to go to an interface rather than through a VPN node.

In other words, I would like for default traffic to go via ifA but for specific exe traffic to go via ifB. Would this be possible?

2

It looks like you’re looking for a new program(?) based on WFP (Windows Filtering Platform). I think it’s possible to implement but need to check how easily I can implement. :slight_smile:

1 Like
3

This topic was automatically closed 21 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.